Thread regarding SAS Institute layoffs

Why is JMP still part of SAS?

  • Folks say JMP is profitable .
  • J So far MP has been insulated from layoffs
  • jMP has been a subsidiary for quite awhile. Likely that was done with the intention of it going solo.

The biggest argument people make is SAS will sell faster if JMP remains part of the for sale bundle. Evidently that is not a big carrot to a buyer because SAS remains unsold .

Mr JS has much more control over the trajectory of JMP if he is running it completely solo. As a subsidiary that could happen quickly if Mr JS wants it.

The status quo could mean JMP is completely gutted(if profitability claims are false) or gets put on a trajectory (post sale/IPO) that won't be palatable to Mr JS.

JMP remains an unaddressed problem. Unaddressed problems seldom self solve....

by
| 3964 views | | 42 replies (last January 29, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jh3fph20

42 replies (most recent on top)

How can JMP be truly identified as profitable if they are still on SAS campus and intertwined with SAS benefits, IT, etc. Do you think all that is taken into account? I don't think the numbers, even to the degree SAS' are, are announced/public so its hard to know.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1jh3fph20

The best answer I can surmise is that JS is taking the path of least resistance by riding out a good thing till a sale or IPO forces him out. After that, he is done and JMP is no longer his major concern. There is no evidence that his heirs care much - if any - about JMP. I believe that if his heirs cared about JMP, that JMP would have been standing on it's own feet long ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jh3fph20

Post a reply

: