Thread regarding GlobalFoundries layoffs

Musings on the big picture and advise

Remember GF's history is not that of a greenfield startup and organic growth, but is full of acquisitions, mergers, technology licensing, and greedy, insecure, corrupt management that nourished a culture of sycophancy. GF started because some smart people convinced the Sheikh (investor) that this is a good idea to park and grow petro-dollars. Great job AMD and governments! It's not everyday you find a BIG foreign investor. But GF leaderships never had what it takes to grow the company. They wanted to be surrounded by yes-men, were thinking short term, and were happy that Sheikh kept pouring money as they were showing false growth by acquisitions and by Samsung's technology. They were all promoting their buddies/mentees and sometimes thought that hiring external people in big positions will fix things, instead of growing the right people internally. Party was going well.

Sheikh had deep pockets, lot of patience and made some bad bets on AMD, but is not stupid. After pouring money for 10 years, and after seeing his other sectors bo-m, Semiconductor dream got shattered. He started looking for an exit strategy since 2018. After failing to find a buyer at a good price, Sheikh agreed to sell 15% stake as the next step in a good year, giving the enterprise a market acceptance. All steps TC took (stopping 7nm, all divestitures) and is still taking are all short term as he thought from the beginning he won't be CEO for more than a couple of years. So now that the share price is well above IPO price, why doesn't the Sheikh cash it out and exit? Because even if he sells 5% stake, stock price will crash and he will get nothing for the rest 80%. Better for him to not sell pieces but sell the whole thing (hoping for a Elon Musk buying Twitter type, or Intel buying Tower). So the mandate for the exec team is to keep showing improving margins for 3-4 quarters, even if no revenue growth or no market share growth, so someone may think of it as a small but well run factory and buy it. That is Mubadala's bet.

But the world is smarter than Mubadala and GF management, and has no risk appetite of this level. No matter how many tricks TC shows in the name of differentiation foundry, and improving financials, it's not going to be convincing to anyone in the US. No one believes GF has any profitable stuff in the pipeline. Only solution I see is selling it to a Chinese investor if the government allows it or licensing technology again. But that will not happen in near future.

If I were top management, I would 0) FIX people. Get rid of non-performing level 10s and up. Listen to people below. Spread power down to levels 9 and 8. They can do better decision making. Couple of years ago, at a 10+ outing, it was thought of but was never acted upon. Bring more transparency in decision making. Stop unnecessary worldwide travels by 10+. 1) Invest whatever little precious R&D $ into right places. Stop stupid projects like the big IT project that is D2F (Destined to Fail), and make vendors rich. Don't pi$$ off small customers and lose whatever you have. 2) Stop this stupid glint survey and get real anonymous feedback from people. How can the engagement and attrition both be high at the same time? The survey is designed to fool the board, that look management is doing a great job, but it's not telling you real feedback. 3) Stop over focus on D&I and super quick promotions to women. It has failed to land GF a buyer, and has hurt the company more. Performance is more important. Recognize real talent and not mediocrity. 4) Stop listening to consultants like McK. We know our business better than them. Raise our strategy teams.

For middle management, only one advice: communicate openly on both sides, without fear.

For employees, quit as soon as you can, if you are not 10+ and got your stocks. If you can not, do quiet quitting. Specially younger people, do not believe in any team sweet talk and actions by the management. You do not have to put your heart and soul into a company which has a grossly untrustworthy, inefficient and unfair management.

by
| 2232 views | | 16 replies (last November 22, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jJtU7cV

16 replies (most recent on top)

@6zgd+1jJtU7cV

Blah blah blah. Poor me, I want to be treated as an equal, but put on a pedestal. Blah blah blah. Nobody cares. Happy Thanksgiving.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6vap+1jJtU7cV

@3abx+1jJtU7cV. Sounds like you got offended as much as I did about it. As I stated I agree with ALL the OPs points, except the one. I dared to speak up how this one point directly affects my personal experiences, and this is what I get. YOU GET OVER YOURSELF, commenter. I KNOW WE ARE ALL REPLACEABLE. It's a force of nature in this industry. Your reply is so expected and typical. You could at least have the respect and dignity of the OP. The OP is well read, professional, and didn't demean me like you're doing and you wonder why women have to organize in the first place. Certain male members get all p-e p-e hurt when you start a god damn fact. Here you are commenter....GFY! I hope you meet the same people on your way up when you're on your way down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6zgd+1jJtU7cV

Why did you focus on stopping quick promotions only to women?. It seems to me there are a lot more incompetent men in decision making positions. Why are all these men getting promoted so quick? Maybe unconscious bias? Maybe focus should be on stopping the good ole boy network.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5pho+1jJtU7cV

@3fcv+1jJtU7cV

Nice ego you have there. Guess what, anyone else can do that same job you think is so vital. Get over yourself, we can all be replaced tomorrow. Selfrightous? Pot, meet kettle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3abx+1jJtU7cV

There are tons of incompetent men in their jobs too. It's still all about connections and not most qualified but now for both genders here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fnt+1jJtU7cV

@3fcv+1jJtU7cV

Read through posts. I hear you. And not trying to diminish your work and accomplishments in the slightest. They’re truly deserving candidates that do need that little extra push to break through. However I think though what has many upset is that at GF these programs to level the playing field have gone too far. So far that now the opposite or reverse prejudice is in place where certain demographics are overlooked in favor of others. So there have been many promoted or elevated into a higher position over a more worthy candidate. This scenario is a bit more frequent at GF than other places.

And it actually hurts the general cause or rationale for such a system. An unqualified person is now in a role that they not ready for or can handle. Then by no fault of their own they do a poor job. It then reflects poorly on the rest of the demographic they originate from. So actually hurting the cause.

So it’s a double whammy. 1. Rubs coworkers wrong way as a more qualified peer is overlooked. (Also sends message to everyone that hardwork and merit are meaningless) 2. Damages reputation of the very group GF is trying to assist.

Now of course this truly in every case. There are dozens of examples where this is not true. And by the sounds of it you are an example showing this. But GF does lean into these programs just a bit much so that it actually creates the opposite effect as pointed out above.

There were some posts on here when head of HR (ER) abruptly retired stating that a new form of institutional and systemic racism and discriminatory practices were installed and enforced at Globalfoundries. And it is because of these types of programs going too far and too often to promote certain groups over others despite achievements and merit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tgb+1jJtU7cV

All the down votes and negative comments prove my point. I even tried being polite about it. I'm not even a feminist either.
I honorably served 4 years active duty in Avionic ECMs. I am no dope. I do not play games. I WORK HARD.
As an MT having the TEL reps stand there in amazement watching me work inside a tool, that was a joy. I asked if they needed something and one guy said he never saw a woman working on a tool before. I said well now you have. Welcome to the USA. I turned around and went back to work.
So, if you're little p-e p-e hurts because I was the only woman on the team of 4 shifts of men at the time then, maybe you're the one with behavior and performance problems and don't deserve a promotion or a raise.
Bunch of self righteous, jealous fu--s. Don't you have golf to go play.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fcv+1jJtU7cV

I think GlobalWomen helped to achieve parity: women also started to get promoted through connections rather than competence. This became very noticeable because women usually have to be a head above the rest to be considered equal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3pzp+1jJtU7cV

I am not talking about current president but person who was president in August 2018

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vwa+1jJtU7cV

@1gbq+1jJtU7cV

I thought the president of globalwomen was the same person who's held about 15 different managerial positions over the last five years? Each one higher paying than the last. Hard to keep track of all the newly invented titles these days.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ihi+1jJtU7cV

The woman who was president of global women at the time of the pivot was laid off !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gbq+1jJtU7cV

GlobalWomen is a Pivot win. So true.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zss+1jJtU7cV

@1syc+1jJtU7cV

Don't begrudge the OP for pointing out the truth. I believe you do have a legitimate point, and am sure you've had a hard climb up the ladder. But the fact remains, a large percentage of females have been advanced far beyond their level of competency just to satisfy the D&I crowd. ER had actually stated that intention in a town hall. It's a fact of life at GF, you are not advanced based on performance or knowledge, you are advanced based upon if you fall into a certain category, or only if it's your year for promotion. Sorry, sad but true.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vak+1jJtU7cV

I agree with every single one of your bullet points. Especially, the wasted money on the McKinsey consulting firm. However, I do take offense at #3. Allow me to explain this from a woman's perspective. I am not here to bash you. This is an ethical dilemma for me. You seem to have some FAB1 influence? I have been here since before FAB8 was built when we were assigned at FAB1. You just don't get it that some women have to work twice as hard to prove they are worthy of a promotion while the men just stand around and chatter. This isn't my first rodeo in this industry. I have 23 years in this male dominated industry, and I know damn well that I have busted my tail to get where I am today, and I deserve better than hearing and reading that line of BS. I've seen and experienced the rampant s-xism that still exists in this industry. I bet you can't say the same, can you?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1syc+1jJtU7cV

So true.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rzn+1jJtU7cV

The leaders and managers from all these mergers are the rejects. The spin off companies (AMD, ibm, etc.) kept those worth keeping. Many of those who were kept had to be put into a different area at parent company, but the parent company decided which were worth keeping and those they want to dispose of and that is how GF management was born.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vhl+1jJtU7cV

Post a reply

: