As this board debates quiet quitting, another stupid term is circling the internet, quiet firing. For those of you who can't understand how a person can do the bare minimum, ask yourself if the below definition of quiet firing reminds you of a certain company? As corporate America tries to convince the world you are a bad person if you quiet quit they must also acknowledge that they created the problem. You reap what you sow.
"If we’re going to accuse workers of quiet quitting, we should also acknowledge the phenomenon of “quiet firing,” in which employers avoid providing all but the bare legal minimum, possibly with the aim of getting unwanted employees to quit.
They may deny raises for years, fail to supply resources while piling on demands, give feedback designed to frustrate and confuse, or grant privileges to select workers based on vague, inconsistent performance standards. Those who don’t like it are welcome to leave."