Thread regarding 3M layoffs

3M Earplug Lawsuit Updates — September 20, 2022

The settlement news yesterday was good. But just before those settlement talks, 3M executives were making statements to investors and financial analysts indicating that they are still clinging to the belief that they can settle the litigation in the bankruptcy court.

Kevin Rhodes, 3M’s Chief Legal Affairs Officer, gave a somewhat delusional presentation at the Conference last Wednesday on the status of the earplug lawsuits. The transcript - passed on to us by a veteran represented by another law firm - is a depressing read.

Rhodes casually brushed off the ruling by the Bankruptcy Court denying which rejected 3M’s bankruptcy strategy. Rhodes labeled the decision as “wrong” and noted that 3M’s appeal has been sent directly to the 7th Circuit. Not mentioned: it has little chance of success.

Rhodes went on to claim that the proposed bankruptcy trust fund of $1 billion is a fair valuation for all earplugs claims. He also has a funny bit where he complains - forgetting for a moment that we are in America - that jury trials are not the appropriate way to handle this litigation. The unspoken part of most of 3M's arguments is that they have hurt so many people they should be given special treatment. 3M also complains that everyone is getting it wrong - multiple judges, juries, and financial analysts. Don't you have to look in the mirror at some point?

Data Source
https://www.millerandzois.com/combat-arms-earplug-lawsuit.html

by
| 1491 views | | 9 replies (last September 21, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1iP2luzO

9 replies (most recent on top)

Bankruptcy is one possible outcome. Another is to work out settlements based upon medically verifiable data, without establishing a predefined individual limit, except in the number of litigants allowed to pursue. At present this is not a class action suit, therefore the rules are a little bit different than say the lawsuit involving Camp Lejeune and the bad water there.

Damage to a water supply will take years of monitoring to conclude. Water sampling devices are placed and checked periodically by qualified and certified personnel. There are literally hundreds of thousands of these devices throughout the world.

Insofar as Aearo Technologies bringing earplugs to 3M, Aearo is a wholly owned, branded, and firm structured under the 3M brand. 3M became culpable the moment the first set of ear plugs rolled out under the new structure and under their name.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uiq+1iP2luzO

OK I get you're a zealot and a purist about how great jury awards are in this circumstance.

Any you may have the power to force 3M into Bankruptcy with more of these massive awards for earplugs and PFAS.

But you will get LESS in BK to help the 'victims' than you would if you left 3M a going concern.

So you care more about this great 'system' in the US (which NO other country has) than you do about victims.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rvo+1iP2luzO

Heck, if 3M employees lose their pensions and/or are laid off due to the settlements bankrupting the company, the Veterans and other taxpayers will end up supporting them in the long run. Also, didn't the defective ear plugs originate long before 3M acquired Aero?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kmz+1iP2luzO

Once again you can blame everyone and everything except the faulty 3M branded, manufactured, and distributed ear plugs.

Once again you can blame everyone and everything except the 3M branded, manufactured, and distributed chemical contamination of water in the United States and around the world.

Our system of government allows individuals to seek redress. It may behoove you to read the US Constitution and seek out a professor who can explain it to you. You act as though what’s happening to 3M is unique. Perhaps living in that bubble so long has made you forget that you and your coworkers are culpable for the behavior of your firm. You can deny it, you can twist in the wind, you can shout at the rain, it will not change the legal system in the United States of America.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tpz+1iP2luzO

Why do you gloat so much on a message board for employees who have been laid off? Now you are going to push the company into bankruptcy and everyone will lose their pension?

You are just cruel.

I know 3M is bad but now we will lose all our pensions is we have already lost most of all our stock investments.

And you will not get much when the company is in bankruptcy either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nqc+1iP2luzO

Plaintiffs see SO much smarter than 3M. How much monwy do they have feon these trials so far?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qsf+1iP2luzO

Rhodes is right that juries are not at all competent to have input into cases like these. And Casey is crooked. Both facts will come out eventually.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @itt+1iP2luzO

It is amazing to see this level of confidence in the midst of such a rapid decline in the stock price, 4 yrs of layoffs in a row, yrs of no travel or expenses, and more. A bunch of liars.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rbr+1iP2luzO

They had their chance to explain why only aearo was accountable for these damages, which looked easy in theory. However, the crackpot legal team still screwed it up and also has pi---d off judge Rodgers.

Maybe too much focus in legal on proper pronouns and not enough on bankruptcy law.

Meanwhile the shares are trading for lows from 2014. Mike and Monish. I'd rather have laurel and hardy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @njc+1iP2luzO

Post a reply

: