I have seen a bit of recent posts where technical people complain about a lack of career opportunities in the technical side. Can anyone comment on what this means?
After getting my PhD, I had multiple offers in the R&D sector from multiple major materials science companies including 3M. But I ended up choosing another because most of my friends who started a career at 3M ended up leaving for other Tech/Chemical companies, which was kind of a red flag. I am aware that the young talents retention is pretty challenging in many traditional materials science companies, but the rate seemed abnormally higher than other counterparts.
From a materials scientist's perspective, 3M has an edge over others through their wealth of technical knowledge and innovations. It's possible that they are relying on their legacy products through incremental work without much innovation, but at the same time their innovation "genes" should be still alive enough to excite scientists and engineers for awhile. I can't really wrap my head around all those complaints..