Competition between employees can be good for productivity. I don’t think there is any more healthy competitiveness at SF however. Increasingly, I am witnessing conflicts and latent animosity among my colleagues. I don't justify it, but I understand to some extent because working here has become more than stressful. I don't know for what reason but what it seems to me is that SF even fosters resentment between us?
17 replies (most recent on top)
Oh little @7dpm. Sounds like you a great ASSet at SF. We’re you recruited?
Clown school is offering scholarships - heard your a top candidate.
@7dpm Sounds like your group is making great use of company time and resources.
@6puj-there is a room full of SF folks here laughing at your idiocy-I read your comments out loud.Thx for lightening up our day baboon.
6phg. Truth is not defamatory. Grow up children and learn about there real world.
Might help ya grow a bit.
6mnz. Are you an id--t or just a stalker with nothing better to do. And make up cr-p like your some cheerleader or genius. Get a life. Big shot. Learn some skills and history
A very bitter human, employee is just part of it. Makes the same nonsensical comments every day. Maladjusted lonely hermit….he used to rave about China LOL.
That is ridiculous. No clear cut examples but rather defamatory accusations. Sounds like a bitter emoloyee.
@4hvv. Get out of your charmed bubble and look at Management and every person getting those positions or in them now. ET is bad but many other areas are as well (married, dating, close relatives, divorced then remarried to another “leader” or in the promo path (and not due to real life experience, hard work, or being a great asset).
Too many to name or mention. Bloomington is probably the worst. Related closely or rural and local family ties.
Third party contracts married or dating internal organization dept Mgrs. galore.
Long list of names can be called out. This is how agenda driven orgs thrive and terrible decisions get made.
And they keep it close to their country club and “career path” chosen team members. Easy big money. Rural, categorized diverse, Silicone Valley and Chicago group-think drives decisions. Not critical risk based thinking. It’s unfortunate for employees and customers.
Reputable companies don’t allow conflicts of interest internally or externally like SF does.
Cheers
I read all these accusations about nepotism but other than the CEO’s kid where else. Clearly you are not assuming married couples are not part of that equation?
I may not be a smart man..but I know what a freak show is..
Nepotism rules farm and their 3rd party “partners”.
yeah but we're diverse and inclusive!
Part of issue as I see it is lack of accountability and having different standards for different people.
Too many chiefs and not enough Indians.
It’s the stupid “top talent” narrative in Management acting like “coaches” and being weird. HR ridiculousness
Welcome to the Squid Game. Brahaha
There’s a difference between beef, and SF and SF recruiting picking up scraps that cause us to work mandatory OT. Then face the fear of this customer complaining. Golden rule is if you’re in it, it’s your fault.