They know a lot. They've done their due diligence and are not bringing up JUST ONE POINT against illegalities WB has committed but about 20. Maybe some dont get validated.... but if 1/2 due they're about to come out of pocket big $.
4 replies (most recent on top)
Would anyone want to guess what law firm worked with the state of California to write those laws for the state?
Guess - N. pea!?
Ohhh I’m just talking “ hypothetically “.... you know ...
The SAME exact LAWFIRM would probably have better information for ya regarding information. Give my regards
You mentioned the state of NY where it is a state law to have a
written commission policy for all companies with outside sales repres., and to communication any commission changes to thier sales repres. in writing. I'm sure WB never did that, maybe they did LOL.
In the State of California, where I don't believe Masons has any sales repres., but I believe they have similar laws like NY has.
Would anyone want to guess what law firm worked with the state of California to write those laws for the state?
If anyone wants to start a lawsuit here in Massachusetts please let me know based on the current lawsuits out there?
Homework was done .
Read the suits .
Wanna play a game!? Let’s play “Add 1 more” (Hypothetically)
Got a “hypothetical “ question for the active rep. Of course only “hypothetically”.
“Hypothetically “ if one is being asked to let customers know about new “policy” charging for ...gee I don’t know.... let’s call it a “standard repair service” (not a filter change) on a Beverage Service Agreement that used to be free, are you getting a new BSA signed ?
Just saying cause “hypothetically” that’s a hypothetical “contract”/ “legal agreement “, no? Like a “hypothetically ” legal one... ?!
I’m so so sooooo curious to ask...But wait !!!
What about those “hypothetical” charges you didn’t know about that got charged already on the “hypothetical” customers that you didn’t give a new BSA out to signed with new terms?
Uh oh... lemme guess. Worry about it if you get “caught” , “hypothetically”, that is?
Why aren’t the ones asking you make those “hypothetical” calls doing it themselves ?
I bet you can guess...
Better yet, in this “hypothetical situation” wouldn't it be easier to have a company send customers “docusigns” with updated terms ...geee... like other companies do . I mean, “hypothetically” companies send high “salesman cost” paper via email to customers although a sales guy or gal has a lower cost paper for the SAME PRODUCT yet if customer buys from the web blast they “hypothetically” pay the higher cost ..., so I’d think it’s possible .
Ohhhh but wait . If “hypothetical companies “ were charging for this nee service it usually comes comes with a cost along with a sell .
So ask yourself this . Think reallllllllllly hard . Ready?
“Hypothetically” , were you even notified of such change in policy IN ADVANCE and notified of the “hypothetical” cost and how that translates regarding commissions?
Hey NY, just curious. If this “hypothetically” happened, (the change that is) y’all get a written notice in advance regarding commissions ?
Luckily this is just hypothetical . It’s not like im suggesting you are really being asked to tell a customer that y’all reneging on a live legal agreement prior to actually sending a customer a revised signed form with the amended contingent of rental .
No worries !
“ Hypothetically “ in a situation like this if a customer finds out , companies can just point to the rep .
I’m sure this is all perfectly legal!
But yeah, this firms seems pretty solid