Thread regarding Xerox Corp. layoffs

Project Own It. Stock price now under $6

After the 1 for 4 split

How is that working out

Another set of C-Suite taking millions in options from the company

How long does Johnny V and team get to crank up the. A/C sales

by
| 1801 views | | 7 replies (last May 20, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1aVkeFy8

7 replies (most recent on top)

Project own it was a disaster because the new leadership was convinced we were all stupid hicks they had no idea what we were doing. They saw $$ where in reality there were never any. Without crucial systems upgrades (45 yr old systems still in use) to modernize the business there was no true productivity other than labor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pyy+1aVkeFy8

The C-Suite has to eat too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xrl+1aVkeFy8

Outsourced to the Outhouse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1flh+1aVkeFy8

It should have been called "project blown it" because it was off the rails as soon as it got started.

Remember all the Lean Six Sigma projects years ago where the project sponsors tried to claim every benefit they could, even if the project had nothing to do with it? Or explain away any shortfalls as "well that wasn't part of the original charter".

Project Blown It was the same thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ddl+1aVkeFy8

That is the playbook boys and girls. Outsource everything and collect the benefits at the top. Sort of like when you have 10 thieves on a job, then the 9th ki--s the 10th, and the 8th ki--s the 9th, and so on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lqs+1aVkeFy8

It basically means outsource all work, get rid of American jobs and the people who made the company profits, sc--w those same workers out of everything so you can pay your board members all the money and not give a damn that the work is being done half a-s by people you pay $2 an hour, it should have been called "Project Who Gives a Damn"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xek+1aVkeFy8

Can someone tell me why it’s called Project Own It? What is that supposed to actually convey?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jqx+1aVkeFy8

Post a reply

: