Thread regarding ConocoPhillips layoffs

Shiva Near

As someone who’s been at the “layoff selection meetings” before, I thought I’d provide some insight.

(1) It’s not about you. It’s always about the managers’ ego. They arrived at this place of enlightened decision making because someone above them liked them and they never forget it. They go home every night and tell their spouses how hard they worked but they persevered because they are so special. Their #1 goal will be to protect themselves, so if “giving in” to another manager’s attack on you shows them more as a “collaborator” (I mean that in the East German sense, not our CDQ sense) they will stab you in the back.

(2) It’s all a negotiation. Ok, I’ll give up two of mine if you give up three of yours. Yours’ are worse for this reason (they made a critical remark at a meeting, did not show proper concern and admiration for my pet project, did not express enough joy or pay enough attention at that safety meeting).

(3) Unless there was a significant medical or personal reason (and even that is probably not enough), if you received a “4” or a “5” you are gone. These are the easily culled at the start of the numbers allocation game.

(4) It ain’t pretty, but age, race, and religion come into the calculation. They are very subtle but I’ve seen this.

(5) If your manager/sponsor is getting layed off and is bitter, the manager won’t care about you. If the manager wants to go and is getting a nice package, he won’t care about you. See a pattern?

(6) The Concho and ConocoPhillips managers at these meetings are sizing each other up. Selection is a secondary goal. They want to know who they can work with, who they will have as future friends, and who will be future enemies.

This is why it take so painfully long. It’s not about you.

So what can you do about it? There’s already been some useful postings here. There is hope. I saw one lazy self-centered employee going into a fetal position and tears after a layoff, but he re-invented himself, got a job at another Big Oil nearby, and is now actually doing quite well. He learned his lesson, says “yes” to everything, plays the corporate game, works long hours, and effectively had no compensation change except for more security, because we are literally the worst of the worst (in every aspect).

If you’re G&G, think changing careers. Big Oil is under attack from the Global Warming folks now, and it won’t be pretty (until the next shock). Think teaching, or, best of all, a government job. If you’re lucky, you’ll get a job in minerals, leasing, safety, or environment where you can get back at this incompetent company. Yes, you’ll take a pay cut, but you’ll have security and will regain your soul, and the in-house competition will be less, so you’ll advance quicker.

If you survive, start preparing now for the next round. The organization is never “right sized” and our leaders’s incompetence and continued mistakes guarantee more. Always have an updated CV handy, don’t keep personal items at work (or on your phone or computer), and network, network, and network.

Last, don’t let this get you down. You started with little and if you’ve been smart you have a lot more. There are lots of places you can get a paycheck and contribute without the vicious cruel reindeer games.

by
| 3521 views | | 9 replies (last February 16, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+19fmimC2

9 replies (most recent on top)

Do yourselves a favor and be thankful for what you’ve had with the company. If you where smart you kept some of what you earned. Know that there is life after oilfield, good life. Also know that the amount of egotistical douche bags you’ve worked with are nowhere in sight after you leave. Management seems to breed and feed off each other’s egos. Be thankful you no longer live that life. I spent a long time with cop. Good company full of sh–ty back stabbing managers. It took a few months but I’m truly thankful I no longer live the boom and bust cycle. Nor do I worry about who’s next. Life is good.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cjnx+19fmimC2

@qih - are you hiring?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8iad+19fmimC2

"(1) It’s not about you. It’s always about the managers’ ego."

OP may be assuming his own ego that he apparently used in these meetings is followed by others.

For those of us who have been let go in the past, we then had to make the same hard decisions at home about what we were going to cut, which kids may not get college paid for and who may not get money for a car. Of course many emotions come into play when making hard decisions, I am not sure why the OP feels the need to make it seems like the decisions makers are being vindictive. Trust me - they would all much rather be choosing what new candidate to hire for their teams.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1efd+19fmimC2

COP is so large that the posts here are both right and wrong and missing things because there are so many supervisors and managers making the decisions. Which, really, is part of the problem. With all the rounds of layoffs there's been in the last 6 years you'd think that they would have substantially reduced the number of rungs on the corporate ladder, but show me where that's been the case.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bgx+19fmimC2

I'm a former COP employee who left on my own to join a different O&G company several years ago. I'm not sure what kind of experience this person had who originally posted but I will affirm their feelings are a far stretch from what really happens, and I have been in a LOT of the layoff discussions, choosing who has to go, and having to tell team members their time is done.

In the end many things do come into play. Usually they start with a target percentage and you have to hit it, that might then be done by a VP or a director - i.e. "you need to cut 20% of your headcount". It is absolutely true that the lower performers are first on the cut list. Next up we take a look at each function and try to think through how we could do it different or stop doing certain things, or maybe teams that we know have excess capacity (i.e. did we sell 3 major assets but our AP team is still the same size as before we sold those?). We also look at how we consolidate manager or director roles and expect a wider breadth from those folks as well, most in the management ranks don't have near high enough expectations. And we look hard at each person - i.e. a good chunk of people come to work, clock in, and for the most part do the job the same way it's always been done, based on how they were taught by the person before them. We look to keep those who work hard, but are the ones that seem to always be coming up with ideas on how to make things better, make processes more efficient, streamline work, etc. If you have a c-appy attitude - probably will get you on the list.

Is there some favoritism - absolutely, bad VP's and directors will make choices for the wrong reasons. And some of them are scared to look at it objectively (i.e. well his kid is dating my daughter so I can't let him go). I can honestly say here at the company I'm with we don't do that, we check each other and ask questions about who is on their list, and pushback if we don't agree. So yes, some are going to protect each other, others don't have the guts to do the right thing or make the right decision. But.....all I can really say is just work hard, do a good job, be proud of what you do, if someone who is a terrible member of management there isn't anything you can do about it. You might get laid off and not be deserving of that fate, you may keep your job when someone more deserving leaves, but in the end hold your head high, be a person of integrity and character. COP isn't perfect but for how ever many number of years you've worked there they have been very generous to you - great pay, great benefits, VCIP, etc. - we all have been very blessed to have a career for as long as we have in Oil and Gas. Count it a blessing and be the bigger person if your bosses do the wrong thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qih+19fmimC2

Very well said OP! I left O&G in 2014 and I have never looked back. Before my time is done I hope to see this loser industry brought down to its knees. Too many frat boys, good old boys and friends of a friend running the industry. The gravy train is about to end.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dhc+19fmimC2

Someone has a LOT of spare time and an overinflated sense of self worth. There is some truth in the long winded post, but also a lot of ego. Definitely makes sense that this is the type of personality making staffing decisions. God help us all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qmt+19fmimC2

This person sounds like and egotistical DB? And no I am not HR lol.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sdv+19fmimC2

Could it be Alaska Office's time to get cut like everyone else has? Fair is fair right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lhh+19fmimC2

Post a reply

: