Thread regarding Belk layoffs

Belk distribution center in Blythewood to undergo $2.5 million upgrade

Spending money on upgrading the warehouse. Albeit a rather small sum.

Hmmm. That kinda goes against much of the scuttlebutt here that Belk will soon be bust.

What about the stores you ask? What about them?

Who needs stores anymore. Did you see where Stein Mart was bought, just for its name, to enable some future on-line only business endeavor.

But we haven't got raises, have had hours and benefits cut and yet Sycamore just dished out $540 mil for another busted retailer, Ann Taylor.

If you got the feeling you don't really matter then welcome to the new age of venture capitalist pirates.

by
| 1291 views | | 3 replies (last December 15, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18mo1nG4

3 replies (most recent on top)

$2.5 million. Over 5 years. Lol. That’s peanuts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4zvx+18mo1nG4

Perhaps they need better and more efficient distribution at Blythewood? Sycamore also owns integration for private label production? Hence the attraction to purchase any retailer offering private label. Smart. If they lose on one venture, they gain wholy on the other. Not sure what that means for any of us at Belk except we may see Ann Taylor label in stores? Talbots seems to be the only retail venture that benefitted by Sycamore’s ownership. For sure, we know Ann Taylor will see a lot of change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vra+18mo1nG4

Gamble:
$ for "upgrade"

Upgrade = more business profit/temporary tax shelter
or
A facility that is more attractive to potential buyers (to unload it)
or
at worst, a healthy tax write-off with bankruptcy

It's a tough win if there is a profit margin, but a necessity for the investors who like to take risks (and obviously they do with the dregs that they buy) and have a need to launder their dirty money even with bad investments.

If the investment firm truly valued the business as a whole and were trying to make it work, you'd hear about it every few minutes in press releases to retail info providers. There is no strategy apart from sinking "play" money into high-risk ventures in hopes of scoring big on a s—er's bet– like a drunken, high-roller bucking the tiger in a losing game of Faro where the odds are all on the house.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @koc+18mo1nG4

Post a reply

: