Still employed, but....
D&I is completely misguided. Appeasing groups like BLM don’t actually help those they supposedly say they do. The end R2-R4 stats seems bizarre. They basically retained basically the same demographics. So they want to promote a bunch of D&I (and get rid of those toxic SWMs) and then it ends up the same? I guess it’s just noise. I tried doing MARC but it’s not really achieving anything meaningful.
IT - boy, where to begin. WAY too many people involved in projects. No one really owns anything because they have split up the ownership and expertise to the point where you need 5 people to answer a question and 5 people to (maybe) solve a problem. In any other function it might take two for the same complexity.
Presidents, VPs and some, but not all, GMs are completely disconnected from the actual work and don’t seem to really care about employees. They won’t ever give honest answers or provide meaningful direction. I think JJ and MW are good, but most other presidents and VPs are just out to lunch. Not much to love about people like JG, AS, and AW. They all just seem like hatchet men and have the attitudes and records to prove it. And KC seems to only know how to push RMFW but really know what anything means.
HES - they say we are in the risk mitigation business but Covid seems to prove they are in the risk avoidance business. Let’s stop pretending that this doesn’t have a cost while we rationalize our poor financial returns.
HR - this petrotech readjustment really messed things up a few years ago. I was 3 years in grade, doing well and getting high marks, and when I was due a promotion, everyone got promoted. I’ve been in this “new” grade for 3 more years and still haven’t had a true merit based promotion in 6-7 years, while performing at a 2/2+ and even getting a 1 one year. HR won’t admit they botched this (and only offered it to US employees). There are some PSG 26s walking around that I wouldn’t trust to do DCA reserves but they talk a good game and have been around a while. Meanwhile there are PSG 23/24s that actually do all the work.
All this being said, nearly all my first line supervisors (about 10 in 12 years) have been good. Understanding, empathetic, and reasonable. I’ve gotten to work on projects than wouldn’t happen many other places and have been technically challenging and supervisors have given me just enough rope to do well. But you start getting above PSG 26/27 and there seems to be highly variable quality in the individual. I probably won’t get much past 26 and at this point and seeing what I’ve seen I am not sure Id want too. Flattening the org probably helps these issues but they still won’t solve those problems.