Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

12% layoffs is bad news for us, worse than it's been in quite some time

Just found out that our business unit will endure about 12% layoffs. I suppose, if you're like me and want the EOI option, it's not so bad. But our BU, one of the top, if not the most profitable & highest production in the country, taking a 12% cut is brutal. Good luck to all and hopefully those who EOI will get their wish, allowing the ones who desperately need a paycheck to support their families, to continue in, and hopefully bring this company out of the ashes to rise again!

by
| 5001 views | | 29 replies (last August 11, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+16lFaxfO

29 replies (most recent on top)

If you do not know what GOM is, you probably do not belong in the oil business. Gulf Of Mexico

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3qad+16lFaxfO

Try 70% in yours, and 0% in mine, and you'll be getting warmer, lol.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3zww+16lFaxfO

Try 70% in some functions...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3haq+16lFaxfO

Most BU’s and companies have already announced their %cuts in last 2 weeks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qfn+16lFaxfO

Some people took the early EOI, some will eoi at the second opportunity. Some people move on to another BU, or another country overseas, San Ramon, etc. Some will be left standing. Some positions are eliminated, some combined, others created, others relocated. Do you have all the org charts from before and after? Did you count the changes in headcount across the enterprise? RM and corporate HR are the only ones who really know the numbers. Everyone else just works in their silo. Show me the hard count figures from payroll and HR, then I will believe 15%. We don't know jack sh#t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qtl+16lFaxfO

We have no reason to have faith in an estimated %. Wait until the shoe drops and then see if you can actually determine the number laid off and the % cut. Guess what you can't. You and I don't have access to that data. They can say whatever they want. Sure you might get close but we will never really know.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nlh+16lFaxfO

Accelerate down stream was - 20% work force reduction - was more

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bek+16lFaxfO

10000 out of 48000 => is 20% , I think you are little on the high side , I'd say 8000 will be let go

8000 times ave O/H per employee charge rate of $150 per hour =>2.3 B saved on compensation/ year

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iuh+16lFaxfO

Just use some uncommon sense dude. They told us that the overall % would be 15 and and and they will be keeping more of the folks who are technical. What this means is: they are cutting > 15% in the earlier rounds but those are only a few employees , the majority will be cut in R4 and that number will probably be around 12-15%. Bottom line that are keeping the technical staff around to keep the basic machines running and cutting out unnecessary fat. This will last a few years until the demand for O&G oil slowly picks up again as the recession fades and they can afford to expand. If you are on a team for a mission critical system and you are good at your job you have fair chance of keeping your roll. They are cutting a lot of ITC because of the move to the azure cloud.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lig+16lFaxfO

I have a feeling that the overall numbers let go are higher than we are being told. Remember when they suggested 15 percent? Nope, many BUs are being cut deeper as shown below. I would suggest over 10,000 are released by end of year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lpt+16lFaxfO

How about those Corporate companies? Are they safer or even deeper cuts?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yye+16lFaxfO

If GOM is 40% but anchor is 0, it means elsewhere in GOM is more than 40%!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ycu+16lFaxfO

What about Tengiz? It’s operating now so I would assume no cuts, like anchor?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fpl+16lFaxfO

1qdd: your post makes no sense. If they had cut everyone in r1 & r2 if would have make little difference in the total numbers laid off as there are just very few people at those grades. That said, one cut in r1 or r2 would have saved money for 10 in R3 or 20 in r4.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1odc+16lFaxfO

They are cutting lower psg folks in round 3 & 4 big time but overall reductions of high level psg’s in round 1 or 2 was minimal so it averages around 15% for the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qdd+16lFaxfO

SJVBU announced 11% last week... ya but that’s because the new buyer wanted to control their own reorg.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bmv+16lFaxfO

Jus kidding.
It’s amazing GOM appears to have survived in any capacity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xah+16lFaxfO

That is sad news about GOM, I heard they were one of the best BU’s in the corporation. Good luck People of GOM you’ll be remembered as some of the best.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jzy+16lFaxfO

SJVBU announced 11% last week

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oel+16lFaxfO

@oqz. The OP could be entirely truthful, it's your post which makes no sense. You have no idea which BU they speak of, yet you falsely make a claim about an unknown BU. Talk about fake news. LOL!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pdn+16lFaxfO

This post does not make sense. What are you trying to say? Your BU not the most profitable.. taking 12% cut is brutal? That's not brutal. 30% is brutal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oqz+16lFaxfO

How about the China BU, anything left of Bahai Bay or CDB?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ygy+16lFaxfO

Every area seems to be 20%, 30%, 40%. How is our overall corporate percentage only 15%? What major areas aren’t getting hit?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pap+16lFaxfO

Gom is 40% except for facilities on anchor and they are like 0%. Wtf is up with that

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jln+16lFaxfO

SASBU has >30%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jap+16lFaxfO

What BU has 12%? MC.. has 17% and SAS.. has 34%. 12% sounds good to me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dth+16lFaxfO

12% is good odds compared to the ABU at 30%. Good luck Mate and look after the family first.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bpj+16lFaxfO

Although I feel your pain, other BUs are being cut much deeper!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xee+16lFaxfO

GOM?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rwo+16lFaxfO

Post a reply

: