Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM sues to stop a former executive from working for Microsoft

IBM, he explained, is highly centralized, and even though he was a senior executive he was not
empowered to make basic managerial decisions without corporate approvals.

“I attempted to change the highly centralized corporate culture at IBM, but after several years of
trying, I came to realize that my efforts were futile under the current leadership.”

So one hydra head cut itself off from the body: many more to go.

https://westfaironline.com/126041/ibm-sues-to-stop-executive-from-working-for-microsoft/

by Anonymous
| 4921 views | | 9 replies (last September 5, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+15GMhIho
Comment! It's anonymous!

9 replies (most recent on top)

The latest status update:

Judge blocks former IBM executive from starting new job with Microsoft –
https://www.reuters.com/article/employment-noncompete/judge-blocks-former-ibm-executive-from-starting-new-job-with-microsoft-idUSL1N2G11CV

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @17pqc+15GMhIho

He signed a non-compete and is no doubt a multi-millionaire. Does someone feel bad for him?

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @5qjl+15GMhIho

Let him go. Another sign IBm is dead. What a shame.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @4wji+15GMhIho

"His decision to leave IBM was not financially motivated. In fact, he declared, he forfeited $8.5 million in stock options that would have vested by 2022.
He was motivated, he said, by “deep unhappiness working for the company.”"

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jws+15GMhIho

He is one of the best IBM executives ever... 25 years at IBM.
From the article : "After leading GTS, he was made general manager of integrated accounts, where he was responsible for overseeing the 77 most valuable customers."

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zdu+15GMhIho

Good riddance as many have already said. He had no vision and no brain.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @swu+15GMhIho

Good riddance. Rodrigo was such a negative influence on GTS. Under his leadership, his business unit shrank, lost major contracts and continued to operate like 1980s. One of the first things Mark Foster did when he was asked to lead IBM Services is to replace Rodrigo who was then assigned to do nothing (other than collecting his salary). The last RA in the US impacted GTS much more than any other IBM units and Rodrigo is to blame. You cannot lead an army to defeat and assume you won't be blamed! Good riddance...

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @ebp+15GMhIho

Wow, the truth comes out. Quite alarming and telling about the IBM management structure. No wonder it is such a calcified company. No change allowed without top level approval. Much, much worse than the military.

From Westfair online article:
"He was motivated (to leave IBM for Microsoft), he said, by “deep unhappiness working for the company.”

"IBM, he explained, is highly centralized, and even though he was a senior executive he was not empowered to make basic managerial decisions without corporate approvals."

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @grw+15GMhIho

In other news, large corporations are in favor of free markets, open competition, and minimizing government interference in business...

  • until something they don't like happens to them, when they will ask the government to bring the full fury of laws and regulations to their aid.
by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @wkp+15GMhIho

Post a reply

: