Thread regarding Halliburton Co. layoffs

Have the software jockeys in Landmark been hit?

I feel like we've been stringing them along for...what? A dang talking helmet?! If I'm going down I want to know if we're going to jettison these failed apps that our "managers" keep going on about!

by
| 1781 views | | 11 replies (last May 25, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+153qyU2e

11 replies (most recent on top)

Oh Man. HAL suffering the same woes as its competitors.

Perhaps the problem is all service companies are just late as hell to the digital party. Frankenstein systems/software integration that creates more tasks and delays. All to simply get a little flashy dashboard so that another clueless manager can show his leader that something is happening.

All this digitization focus and they are forgetting the people in the field actually doing the work!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5srn+153qyU2e

But earn more money than the real men. And get the dates when the real men are toiling around

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3gli+153qyU2e

"software guys aren't real men 🤣🤣🤣

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3rig+153qyU2e

landmark has been terrible since day one........ they have always struggled to fit into hal. software guys aren't real men.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pmu+153qyU2e

@pca+153qyU2e From Madras to Houston. What is Madras known for exactly?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1squ+153qyU2e

The kids won’t call you daddy unless you fk their mommy

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aot+153qyU2e

decision space is a fraud, RTS is a fraud...now all landmark is interested in is taking the IP from the psls and selling it to anyone...they're incredibly desperate now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ocx+153qyU2e

Nagaraj Srinivasan Landmark Vice President

Joined Halliburton in 2011, focusing on product strategy and delivery of Landmark software.

Prior to joining Landmark, Srinivasan had a successful 18-year career with Oracle, where he was vice president for Supply Chain Products.

From supply chain products to O&G software?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pca+153qyU2e

Landmark software is poorly designed. It reminds me of applications back in the early 2000s when the only goal was to make them work, leaving aside all functionality and efficiency. They should be an example of how not to write business applications.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dkp+153qyU2e

Landmark started losing software development drive innovation and market share when Halliburton hired Landmark leadership executives with no experience in O&G software.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mti+153qyU2e

Landmark is being run into the ground. Won't be long before clients figure this out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @odz+153qyU2e

Post a reply

: