Thread regarding Chesapeake Energy Corp. layoffs

Chesapeake Engineers

Chesapeake engineers are the dumbest laziest engineers in the industry. Blame them for your company falling apart.

by
| 2472 views | | 11 replies (last May 5, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+14CX1gLQ

11 replies (most recent on top)

Having Chesapeake on your resume is equivalent to saying you're a complete jacka$$.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cnec+14CX1gLQ

I will not hire any young engineers with Chesapeake on their resume

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ayov+14CX1gLQ

Totally agree with the OP, bunch of id–ts. I worked there for a few years, and they ganged up on me for making them look stupid all the time. Good luck with the bankruptcy, rtards.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @avhu+14CX1gLQ

They’re neither dumb nor lazy. They simply have no passion for what they’re doing. Most grew up in the suburbs or out of state and only got into the oil business for the money. They think of the “field” as some foreign country and anybody who works there as uneducated and ignorant. This downturn will hopefully get rid of all those arrogant, unmotivated a** ki**ers that seem to be in every engineering department

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8zki+14CX1gLQ

Most of the engineers that started at CHK and have only seen CHK are pretty terrible. I’m talking guys that started within the last 5-7 years. A few that are still around with more than 7 years are pretty great. Pretty much all the young ones s—, but that’s mostly because of who has managed them. The young ones usually don’t lack motivation, they just lack guidance. Some have moved on and are doing better... proof of that statement.

There are still a few that are great. Just very few. This is probably the case at most operators. And most engineers with less than 5-7 years who have only seen things with one operator are probably terrible at other companies, too.

Chesapeake engineers both s— and are as great as most any other company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gyo+14CX1gLQ

This is true for the petrotech program graduates especially with start date 2009-2013. Engineers who came from other companies in the last five years are actually good engineers. It is also common to be assigned bad projects by incompetent management. Bad projects distract from assigned work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ybq+14CX1gLQ

Very few good engineers left at Chesapeake. Just a bunch of 23 year olds who say yes sir consistently.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yrm+14CX1gLQ

There are also id–ts out there claiming to be engineers who don't even have engineering degrees.
"Oh hey, I'm a Landman so I must be an engineer!"
"I have an Education degree, that's engineering isn't it?"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kga+14CX1gLQ

You can’t be dumb and be an engineer. You would never get through the math and physics in college. But you could lack common sense because you never owned and used a toolbox and then went to Texas A&M University.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dot+14CX1gLQ

I haven't. And I've worked at a lot of different companies. The ones here are the reason this company is toast.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pdc+14CX1gLQ

Please, I've seen tons of engineers work their asses off and speak out over a decade of bad decisions, only to get zero support from managers afraid of making waves with the executives. Too busy chasing promotions to worry about the company dying.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yfk+14CX1gLQ

Post a reply

: