Thread regarding Morgan Stanley layoffs

Projects that are eating a lot of money in most jeopardy

Each department has a cost reduction goal (e.g., 5%) given from the senior management. They aim at the least important projects, or those projects that are eating a lot of money. Manager then decide which to lay off according to some ranking list (e.g., if X is laid off, can the team survives? can we deliver our requirements?). Obviously, one team/department may be hit more than 5%. .. and No - being paid too much is not a reason, unless you are a consultant and your agent is taking a huge commission.

I thought this needed to be on top today, since the layoffs are continuing, for info. I read it here: @12rICSj7-gaz

by
| 1421 views | | 2 replies (last December 11, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+12rDWN7k

2 replies (most recent on top)

The numbers don't add up for sure.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yec+12rDWN7k

The big question is: who the f**k decided that the 5% reduction goal is necessary for the operations & IT staff, when the fatcat CEO himself got a BIG BOOST in raise ? How fair is that? It reeks of utter unfairness and elitist egoism for the top brass executives.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-18/morgan-stanley-lifts-gorman-s-pay-to-record-29-million-for-2018
"Morgan Stanley boosted Chief Executive Officer James Gorman's compensation by 7.4 percent to $29 million for 2018."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ycf+12rDWN7k

Post a reply

: