Thread regarding Mattel Inc. layoffs

More on whistleblower letter

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-13/mattel-is-said-to-have-sought-delay-not-sc-apping-of-debt-deal

In a sign that Mattel Inc. isn’t too worried about the whistleblower letter that upended last week’s $250 million bond offering, the toymaker initially asked bankers to delay the sale for just a couple of days, according to people who have communicated with company officials.

The closing was sc-apped when at least one of the banks involved balked at a postponement because the bonds had already been priced, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the communications were private. An additional person familiar with the deal said the banks learned of the letter after the pricing. Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co. were among the institutions involved.

Mattel is playing down the situation as a case of being overly cautious, the people said. The toymaker was made aware of the letter Aug. 6, just two days before the scheduled closing. Citing the need for more time to investigate the allegations, which haven’t been made public, the company disclosed on Aug. 8 that the deal had been canceled.

In the public filing, the company didn’t say how it learned of what it called an “anonymous whistleblower letter” or whether a regulator was involved. That’s because the notification came from a third party that’s outside of government, the people said of Mattel’s account.

by
| 2961 views | | 6 replies (last August 20, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+10wP6Phl

6 replies (most recent on top)

OK, so two months ago, MGA makes unsolicited move to buy Mattel and is rejected by the board. Is it any surprise that an anonymous whistler blower letter appears just in time to foil Mattel's attempt to raise cash to pay off their bonds. MGA has fetishized Mattel as their sworn enemy and would do anything to damage their business.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7ukn+10wP6Phl

It's all f—ed. Who cares?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7wvj+10wP6Phl

the banks down own mattel per se, but they do have a financial stake as they underwrite the loans for projected product, so when a season is a dud (which has been the case for the last 5 years) they want their payment towards the loan. since mattel is running on fumes, there’s panic and the issuance of bonds to try to generate cash. it’s a game of robbing peter to pay paul but peter bought himself a brinks truck and hired armed guards.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4ywl+10wP6Phl

I'm pretty sure this guy who keeps posting questions about MAT stock and potential sale is not a native English speaker, some poor guy who owns a bunch of MAT desperate for some inside line on the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ntr+10wP6Phl

The banks don't own Mattel so how can they "sell the whole company" this was a bond to raise money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3kxr+10wP6Phl

Will these banks try to sell the whole Company?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3mex+10wP6Phl

Post a reply

: