Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

GOM SAFETY. All of a sudden GOMBU isn’t a safe place to be, what gives?

by
| 3921 views | | 20 replies (last August 9, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+105iq6aJ

20 replies (most recent on top)

GOM Safety will be back, though it may take some more bloodshed. The fall started when Casey retired, he cared and knew what he was doing. Right after Casey was an exodus of a lot of experience and people who knew what they were doing. The VP and GM at that time were non-factors in pretty anything, particularly Safety. Connor at GM now also cares and is legit, but what he has to work with in Safety Leadership is underpowered and those gaps will continue to hurt for a while. The VPs are figureheads, not really a factor save for a couple of them through the years. With at least one more exodus of experience happening as we speak we can only hope that it doesn't get much worse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nuwo+105iq6aJ

Thats not true, in GOM D&C there is always time to do it right.............Until it cost money, then F@ck it just get'R done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fpht+105iq6aJ

They not bad people, they just don’t know.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eqhr+105iq6aJ

I think I know what you are saying. Since D&C took over HES Corp nearly two years ago, the low moral and discriminatory activities have been transferred to that organization. I do work in GOM and I can tell you, I came from Corp HES and it was bad when I was there but I hear it is even worse now. It is all tied to MARC. I just sat through our PDC meeting in Houston to talk about clear leader behaviors and I can tell you, it is all BS. We meet to do our local selections and the question is always, do we have a female that can do that job. It is wrong.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @blsk+105iq6aJ

Look who is running HES...... D&C - enough said.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bkfi+105iq6aJ

Of course there is an extra cost for safety, and like everything else you get what you pay for. Now saying all that, a good safety department makes up it's cost in productivity and profit. But it absolutely costs money for safety, same as it costs do drill a well, set a platform etc. Without the expenditure in all of the above there will be no return.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4lfs+105iq6aJ

There is no extra cost for safety. What do you mean paying for safety?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4mdi+105iq6aJ

They mean well but with a purge you have to learn some things the hard way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3aaz+105iq6aJ

Cycles. It's not that the current cast in GOMBU doesn't want safety, or that they won't pay for it, it's just that they pretty much don't know how to get the results they want. As a Business Partner the people we dealt with 5 years ago knew their stuff, had lived and learned and it showed. The ones in place now mean well, I'll leave it at that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3nuw+105iq6aJ

@3ews, I agree safety is important, but the unwritten first rule in the Chevron Way and Tenets Operation is Make Money. Everyone knows this, only they keep their mouths shut about it. Not just at Chevron, but everywhere.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3uqo+105iq6aJ

One more Deepwater Horizon Macondo-like event would put the issue of GOMBU safety into a perspective all can understand. Lets hope that doesn’t happen but in a lower for longer price environment it might be the death knell of the BU if another moratorium were issued. Safety should be of the utmost importance IMHO. The safety culture has changed in GOMBU. Not for the better. That is palpable to those with pay attention. The de-emphasis on safety is not consistent with the Chevron Way and Tenets Operation. It starts at the top.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ews+105iq6aJ

There are several reasons why a company won’t spend copious amounts on safety and nor are they expected to. One is that we don’t want to discourage companies entering a particular industry because of the subsequent loss of employment and opportunities to life’s enjoyment. Another relates to the doctrine of distributive compensation, i.e. insurance. If something goes wrong then the insurance firm pays up which means society foots the bill. The only cost to the company is the insurance premium which is covered by the stakeholders in that company such as the employees.

Safety isn’t just about economics, it’s also to do with what’s fair, reasonable and just as per the Caparo principle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3sni+105iq6aJ

GOM often takes safety several magnitudes above the company norm, maybe other BU’s as well. It’s been observed however that when $ cost per barrel approaches $40 this problem goes away. It’s like Magic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3zsx+105iq6aJ

Another monthly newsletter will solve the problem !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wat+105iq6aJ

Covington.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tyi+105iq6aJ

GOM or Covington?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1slz+105iq6aJ

The drama continues in GOM. If you are not one of the chosen favorites you are out. Employees with strong voices are pushed aside for the ones that keep their mouths shut and just go along. Moving to Downstream has been a breath of fresh air for me as a 15 year employee.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ejm+105iq6aJ

Well basically it’s the terminal decline of fossil fuel. Machiavellians have the best chance of survival.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mnm+105iq6aJ

All of a sudden? Its GOM. You can't do anything there without someone coming after you with claws out and throwing a tantrum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gdo+105iq6aJ

Not just GOM. BAKO too. New CEO, new culture.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jqd+105iq6aJ

Post a reply

: