Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

PDC for 25 & up in ITC. Why is ITC still running Chevron

So much FAT & incompetence in ITC (24 & up) is not even funny. Bill you had me at hello but you're no different than Louie or Masada.. Got your balls in the CVX jar. I am done with you. Where is Randy when you need him. Keep firing the indians for the past 3 ROM's and yet so many effing 25-28 left. So now they have a PDC for 25 and up in ITC. Good to have an MBA? MAB effing s---s balls I wonder how good will this do. Probably pushing the 25 down and fire more indians. Your FAT is what's keeping you down.

And we're spending half billion on Cybersecurity (2015-2016) ? HALF BIL PEOPLE. 400+ full time cyber employees and an army of expensive consultants? Are you effing NUTS? Is now cyber more important than HES loss ( environment or life)? You accelerate cybersecurity when your IT footprint is shrinking and moving to the cloud? IT will be gone in the next 5 years. Talking about timing and stupidity. A cybersecurity event never took an O&G company down (even Saudi Ramco) but an environmental disaster (BP) did the job. So how come you're not spending half bill in HES ? Bill seriously ? Where is Rich Jackson when you need him. Rich was sound. Van DeBoom your bonner is over. Just role over and retire man.

by
| 3274 views | | 18 replies (last March 22, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+JFtxuwp

18 replies (most recent on top)

well this is a gem that I found from the past. After #imagineIT proudly said they will have a goal of building a powerhouse organization of software engineers so we can run a better IT shop. You still have your high PSG 25/26/27s managing technical people even though they aren't technical. You still have the majority of your software engineering services leadership in San Ramon and all the key people calling the shots in San Ramon for IT, especially for ImagineIT. Have we ever stopped to think that we will never be able to build a "powerhouse" software engineering organization when great (and even just good) software engineers who live in the Bay Area are not working for Chevron. On the other hand, there are good software engineers who live all over the country (even Houston) for personal reasons and can work remotely to deliver more than the losers in San Ramon, when they can't get a job elsewhere in a tech company in the Bay.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @krlxa+JFtxuwp

I certainly wish I was in IT, a coder, software engineer, etc. at this point. I would proudly and happily take any criticism from idiots on sites like these for the pay, benefits and marketability of IT and it's related fields at this juncture. No Problem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5qmp+JFtxuwp

Facilities Engineer - 27 years experience. laid off end of last year, still no job. No one's hiring. Don't get me wrong, I may have passed up a few timbuktu odd-ball positions doing trash work, but nothing decent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5lei+JFtxuwp

I lost my IT job at Chevron earlier this year. I got a job right away. I'm getting paid more and I also have better benefits, but that's typical in IT when you switch jobs. Also no longer in O & G, Don't give up hope. Good luck to all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5qao+JFtxuwp

Nah there's just that many of you chasing the same pie. Did I hurt some feelings? Help desk monkey out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5vlu+JFtxuwp

Yeah, because no other industry hires engineers? F' off help desk monkey.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4miq+JFtxuwp

Important enough to be employable in other industries compared to you one trick oil and gas ponies. Good luck when you get layed off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xwc+JFtxuwp

Awwww look, another IT nerd that thinks he's important. How cute.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zpc+JFtxuwp

Chevron threatens the layoff, whenever someone posts details on nepotism and gutter-level back stabbing. Keep a lid on it. This is a great company, everyone has stop work authority. The Deepeater Horizons cold never happen to us! Right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qha+JFtxuwp

-1fbj, I'm not sure who you are directing your comment at, but you cannot take one incident as a basis for judging decades of performance. There are much more frequent accidents, including fatalities, with independents than Chevron could ever match and I am lucky that I am still alive after all those years. I have worked for quite a few of them. Count your blessings that you work for Chevron, from an HES standpoint, if that's your main concern, for most it's not, at this time it's simply having a job at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vda+JFtxuwp

@-1scy: Exceptional record? What are you smoking?

You tell that to the families of the 6 folks that perished last week at the Heli crash in Malongo.

And still one is missing... Our prayers with their families; tragic event.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fbj+JFtxuwp

Looks like -jfn is the poor wittle baby who needs a glass of warm milk. The poor little politically correct indoctrinated victimized liberal sponge douche-bag Chevroid mental midget simpleton. All of the fatalities in every O&G operation onshore and offshore and in all mining operations, manufacturing facilities, and chemical plants are all Chevron's fault to him, in spite of Chevron's exceptional safety record, better than any of their competitors. To him, the Horizon disaster was Chevron's fault also. He is also the type who would believe that Obama's is directly responsible for anything good that happens during his watch, in spite of his opposition to it or voting for bills opposing it's progress, and will pin blame on Bush for bad things distantly unrelated to anything controlled or even remotely affected by the presidency. So sad. I will try to remember to say a prayer for him to regain consciousness and lucidity. That's of course if the effects of man-made climate change don't burn his house and family to ashes in the next few months, which is pretty much a certainty, it's only a matter of time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1scy+JFtxuwp

What life? What fatalities? According to some ignorant fact deniers on here, Chevron hasn't killed anyone during the course of their business. Its all a lie - their families are only imagining that their spouse/father/son are gone. Listen to Chevron. Its all a lie that there have been fatalities. Urinate on those grave stones like a good Chevroid.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jfn+JFtxuwp

Many Fortune 100 companies have for a few years projected removable hard drives and flash drives from being used on their company computers and laptops. Chevron still enables this weakness in cyber security to continue. Would blocking this access not be one simple line of defense Chevron ITC can employ against data theft and abuse? Seems like a low cost measure that would take only one hour and a low level technician to get done. Why doesn't ITC and all Chevron departments first consider low tech solutions before embarking on million dollar pie-in-the-sky whims?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hrn+JFtxuwp

Chevron has gone overboard on cybersecurity recently (this year). It's begun to affect the productivity of me and my co-workers. We work in an engineering function. We now have big brother watching us anytime we log on, click a webpage, send an email, message a co-worker. The spyware they have put on our computers is bad enough to bog them down. It's out of hand and based on this half billion figure reported by the OP I see why. Well... I guess IT folks know how to keep jobs in an O&G downturn... Scare the board into spending big in this area. Meanwhile incidents/injuries/fatalities during routine work are on the rise...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pzj+JFtxuwp

Your sir need a big hug. It's going to be alright, grab a glass of warm milk and just breath.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fip+JFtxuwp

Yea

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fdq+JFtxuwp

Chevron is F-ing Up everywhere, not only in ITC.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yht+JFtxuwp

Post a reply

: