Judging by the number of locations that people are saying were affected, I’d say the number of laid off people is much bigger than the company cares to admit. Approximately how many people were affected by this wave of layoff, realistically, and were there affected locations that “went under the radar”. Also another appropriate question would be how many more employees could be affected in this round?
8 replies (most recent on top)
@hzbs, so true. #GOLD #affected
How many realistically affected? Well you have the laid off person’s family, community then the govt. pays unemployment. Then the company pays severance for no productivity from that employee.
Then you have the long lasting affect of valuable experience and good morale being gone. You’ll have good employees with experience looking over their shoulder and looking to get out simply because they’ve witnessed layoffs happening to good, valuable workers.
How many realistically affected? Well you have the laid off person’s family, community then the govt. pays unemployment. Then the company pays severance for no productivity from that employee.
Then you have the long lasting affect of valuable experience and good morale being gone. You’ll have good employees with experience looking over their shoulder and looking to get out simply because they’ve witnessed layoffs happening to good, valuable workers.
Time to invest in office supplies - demand for folders is skyrocketing thanks to HR.
I was caught up in it in 2014 when they cut 30,000+ still have a few contacts there but the morale still s—s from what I hear. Good luck guys and girls.
Pay Band may come into play in the calculation
8% of 60,000 = 4,800
1800 already or will be 1800 total
1800 in this round